decision sent to author nature reject

4a. Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript, HANDBOOK: A practical handbook of templates for communicating with the journal. Authors will be contacted immediately after a decision has been made. My father emptied the thing at an unknown date ruining my spontaneous project, but at least I was able to recover the skull, jaw, spine & ribs. I think typically desk rejects happen in a few days. Geology: https://geology.msubmit.net ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). When all the reviewer reports are received, the editors decide to either: If you are invited to revise and resubmit your manuscript, you should follow the instructions provided by the editor in their decision email. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. After all revisions have been made (papers may be returned to the author more than once for revision), if the paper is found suitable for publication in a GSA journal, the Science Editor will send a final decision letter to the author, accepting the manuscript for publication. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for peer review based on the degree to which it advances our understanding of the field, the soundness of conclusions, the extent to which the evidence presented - including appropriate data and analyses - supports these conclusions, and the wide relevance of these conclusions to the journals readership. When should you challenge an editors decision to reject a paper? Difficult to follow logic or poorly presented data. They should be able to offer you an extension but it is best to discuss this with them as early as possible. Internet Explorer). The editor responsible for the final decision has the discretion however to weight individual reviewer comments as appropriate based on the expertise of each reviewer in the relevant areas and the reviewers . Cactus Communications. Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. //-->Submission Status Guide | Dove Press Author Guidelines | Dove Press Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. Differentiate between reviewer comments and your responses in your letter. Nature Plants (Nat. Information for authors | Science | AAAS GSA publication submissions are expected to be innovative, provocative (or describe a significant advance in the field), of timely significance, and of broad interest, either within a discipline and/or across disciplines. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Like other journals in the Nature family, Nature Plants has no external editorial board involved in editorial decision-making. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. //-->How do Editors reject an Editorial Manager submission and - Elsevier But on the status, "decision sent to author" and "decision sent to reviewers" are listed together. When challenging the decision you may receive a letter from the editor explaining . A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). Learn how to publish, peer review and collaborate with the online courses from Nature Masterclasses. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. Rejection of your paper / manuscript : Nature Support Nature Support Rejection of your paper / manuscript Modified on: Mon, 26 Jul, 2021 at 6:04 PM Springer is committed to your publishing. When submitting a revised manuscript, the author follows the same submission steps and the revised paper again goes through an initial quality check. Geosphere: geosphere@geosociety.org. Nature decision sent to author meaning - ete.leahmaschek.de Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. Also you have to assume people have been off for the holiday. [CDATA[> [CDATA[> These are considered appeals, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions. Content should reflect new discoveries or approaches, and should not overlap with publications presented elsewhere by the authors. Cookie Notice You have now completed the learning part of the tutorial, and so we recommend that you take the quiz to consolidate your learning. As appeals are matters of journal policy they are given lower priority than new submissions and may take at least several weeks, if not longer, to resolve. Geosphere: https://geosphere.msubmit.net, First-time users will need to register for an account at this URL using their active e-mail addresses. Not sure what the right forum is for this. The Springer Nature e-proofing system is a unique solution that will enable authors to remotely edit /correct article proofs. GSA Bulletin: https://gsabulletin.msubmit.net Nature 's. So far I have not received any email which tells rejection. If you are unsuccessful after sending a response letter, then you should strongly consider selecting another journal. Resubmission pending. After providing a brief account of the nature of agency-based reasons, we argue that there is good reason to think that these reasons apply to at least chimpanzees. The login screen changed from "live manuscript" to "post decision manuscript" in a week, so I assumed it was desk rejected. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. ago. Editorial Process | Oncogene - Nature It just says editor assigned and manuscript under consideration. Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. Internet Explorer). The editor contacts the author with the decision. Technical reasons for rejection include: These rejection reasons can be avoided by investing enough time in reading around the subject area, carefully deciding on the topic to focus on, the hypothesis and planning a comprehensive experiment as outlined in the Springer Nature Journal Tutorial: Writing a Journal Manuscript. [CDATA[// >Editorial criteria and processes | Nature English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. I think the manuscript "under consideration" is an auto-update that appears as soon as an editor has been assigned. TIP: Do not make appeals personal attacks on the Editors or reviewers. Clearly explain why you disagree with the decision and provide any new information that you would like the editors to take into consideration. The paper is rejected because the referees have raised considerable technical objections and/or the authors claim has not been adequately established. If the editor decides to send the manuscript to peer reviewers, they will contact researchers with relevant expertise. Authors Holly Kantin, David Wendler. Rejection of your paper / manuscript : Nature Support Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the editors are convinced that the original decision was an error. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage. You can avoid these rejection reasons by following the journal specific guidelines, ensuring you write a coherent paper in good English and honestly assessing you work when deciding on a target journal. Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Plants submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. So, in October 2018, we added a new . What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? - Elsevier If an author wishes to appeal against Nature 's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. For translations into other languages, we recommend using YouTube's translation feature. Science is a weekly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes significant original scientific research, plus reviews as well as commentary on current research, science policy, and issues of interest to the broad scientific community. Further consideration may be merited if a reviewer made substantial errors of fact or there is significant evidence of bias, but only if a reversal of that reviewer's opinion would have changed the original decision. The author is being contacted about the Editor-in-Chief's decision. [CDATA[// >